Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor, will the Dimensity beat the Google tensor?
Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor:
Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor– Hey what’s up guys? Welcome back to my website. In today’s article. I’m going to compare the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 with the Google tensor. I’m going to give you its complete details. So, without any further delay, let’s get started.
Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor:
So, the newly launched MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is going to be compared with the Google tensor. It’s going to be a huge difference between them because the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is coming with the flagship performance while the Google tensor is based on an old processor that is Exynos 9855.
Now, let’s just compare these both chipsets. I will make a fair review, I will also talk about the differences, benchmark, Antutu 9, geekbench 5, and specs.
CPU Performance
Dimensity 9000 | Google Tensor | |
Single and multi-core processor tests | 93 | 75 |
Gaming Performance | 98 | 84 |
Battery life | 91 | 92 |
The CPU performance of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is clearly ahead because it scores 94 percent and the Google tensor scores 76 percent. The gaming performance of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is also 98%. The Google tensor from 76 to 84% in gaming performance. Now let’s talk about the battery life. The battery life of the Google tensor is 1% ahead of the MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Differences
The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 has 4MB larger L3 cache than the Google tensor, and also shows significantly better Antutu 9 scores beating Google tensor up to 49% and, also based on four nanometer processor versus 5 nanometer processor, and also supports 17% higher memory bandwidth 60 against 51.2 and also have the higher clock speeds of 9% and launched with the better-set instruction architecture.
AnTuTu 9
The AnTuTu 9 Benchmark measures, GPU, CPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 9000 | Google Tensor | |
The AnTuTu 9 Benchmark | Dimensity 9000 +51% (1014587)
|
Google Tensor (672425) |
GPU
|
393810 | 278665 |
CPU
|
256987 | 167563 |
UX
|
179801 | 138716 |
Memory
|
186890 | 91371 |
Total score
|
1014587 | 672425 |
Now let’s start with the benchmarks of antutu 9. This Antutu benchmark measured the CPU, GPU, ram, and input/output performance in different scenarios. The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 clearly beats the Google tensor up to 49%, because it’s scoring 1014587 beating the Google tensor by 49%. The CPU performance is clearly ahead of the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 from the Google tensor. The GPUs also show the best performance I’ve ever seen on any chipset. The GPU performance also shows the 393810. The memory is faster up to 100%, faster in memory from the Google tensor to the MediaTek Dimensity 9000, because it scored 186890 vs. 91371 wow. The total scores beat the Google tensor in the Antutu 9 benchmark.
Geekbench 5
Dimensity 9000 | Google Tensor | |
Single-Core | 1261 | 1046 |
Multi-Core | 4303 | 2823 |
Now let’s talk about this geekbench 5. The single core performance of the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 clearly ahead up to 21% from the Google tensor beating the Google tensor in single-core performance. The multicore performance, the Google tensor is clearly down and MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is clearly ahead up to 52% crashing the Google tensor by up to 52%.
CPU Comparison
Dimensity 9000 | Google Tensor | |
Architecture
|
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76 |
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55 |
Cores
|
8 | 8 |
Frequency
|
3050 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Instruction set
|
ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L3 cache
|
8 MB | 4 MB |
Process
|
4 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 uses the cortex x2 core at 3.5Ghz versus cortex x1 on the Google tensor that have 2 cores on 2.8Ghz. The frequency is also faster on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000. Instructions set architecture is also newer on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000. The l3 cache and l2 caches of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 are also ahead of the Google tensor, beating the Google tensor CPU performance.
Graphics Comparisons
Dimensity 9000 | Google Tensor | |
GPU name
|
Mali Mali-G710 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
GPU frequency
|
850 MHz | 848 MHz |
Execution units
|
10 | 20 |
Architecture
|
Valhall | Valhall |
Shading units
|
– | 320 |
DirectX version
|
12 | 12 |
Now let’s talk about the graphics. The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 uses GPU Mali-G710 and the Google tensor using the Mali-G78 MP20. Their architecture is based on Valhall but the GPU frequency is the same, and the execution units are still great on the Google tensor that’s why the Google tensor has gained up to 27% in the graphics performance.
Now let’s talk about the memory. They both use the LPDDR5 but the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 uses the LPDDR5X. The memory frequency also goes to MediaTek Dimensity 9000 which is 3750 MHz. The Google tensor is also using the LPDDR5, but its memory frequency is 3200 MHz. The max memory bandwidth on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 60GB vs the Google tensor 51GB per second.
Now let’s talk about multimedia. The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 uses its own CPU and the Google tensor uses its tensor processing unit. They’re both based on UFS 3.1 storage. The max display resolution goes to Google tensor because it’s able to support 4k versus MediaTek Dimensity 9000 that supports up to QUAD HD plus resolution. The max camera resolution on MediaTek Dimensity 9000 can support 320-megapixel camera wow that is awesome, but the Google tensor is only kept on 12 megapixels. The video captures also show that the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 can support 8k, but the Google Tensor also supports 8k up to 30 fps wow that is amazing and the video playback is also 8k at 60fps. The video codecs and audio codecs are pretty much the same on both chipsets.
Now let’s talk connectivity. They both support 5g, but the Bluetooth version on MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is clearly newer because they are using the Bluetooth version of 5.3. They both support the LTE CAT 24. The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 was announced in November 2021 versus Google tensor in October 2021.